The Internet is a powerfull tool when it comes to distributing information to a large public world-wide and within a minimum of time.

This rapid distribution of information has in co-operation with the other mass media within a short period of time caused the Republican running mate Sarah Palin´s credibility and moral character to be called in question.

I have read, that Sarah Palin is now apparently the female, whose name is the most searched for at Google world-wide and that interest in getting to know information about her can mainly be put down to the many accusations of bad moral standards, that have sprung up as many sceletons in the closet have been revealed in the investigation of Sarah Palin´s past and personal life: her teenage daughter is pregnant, her son has been involved in drug crime, accusations of both infidelity and corruption, dishonesty regarding support to Alaska´s secession from The United States of America, etc.

But how shall the electors evaluate this revelation of Sarah Palin´s character? Does Sarah Palin with her apperently unstable private life simply represent human errors people can relate to and sympathize with as long as she strives to improve and be a hard-working politician? Or is her moral character so corrupted, that she is not worthy of representing an American ideal and make strong and vital decisions on behalf of the American people?

In my opinion, it seems like there is just too much of a hipocritic gap between talk and actions for Sarah Palin. But I am very curious to know, how the American elector sees her.